Comments on: Book Review: Mary and Philip: The Marriage of Tudor England and Hapsburg Spain https://2022hist635.jessicaotis.com/2022/02/13/book-review-mary-and-philip-the-marriage-of-tudor-england-and-hapsburg-spain/ HIST 635 Spring 2022 Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:18:18 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.0 By: Callan Hass https://2022hist635.jessicaotis.com/2022/02/13/book-review-mary-and-philip-the-marriage-of-tudor-england-and-hapsburg-spain/#comment-29 Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:18:18 +0000 https://2022hist635.jessicaotis.com/?p=527#comment-29 Anna, I cannot agree more with the statement you made about Samson’s lack of organization. I often found myself completely lost in regards to the chapter’s topic and frustrated by the redundancy of some of the information presented. The chapter titles were misleading as he often ended up on a completely different topic than he set out to discuss in the beginning of the chapter. The sheer number of sources used was also incredibly overwhelming, sometimes amounting to over one-hundred in a single chapter. I wonder if he had used less sources and instead focused on his strongest points in a more concise structure would this be a more captivating read? Did he undermine his credibility by being so ambitious with sources and perhaps biting off more than he could chew? Despite this, I believe Samson did an excellent job of discussing the historiography of Mary and Philip’s union and setting up his argument within the introduction.

I appreciated Samson’s efforts to shed light on overlooked aspects of Mary I and Phillip II’s marriage as I did not have much knowledge beyond the “Bloody Mary” trope that is taught in grade school. The economic factors and cultural implications of such union are crucial in understanding the huge grey area that was their marriage. An Anglo-Spanish marriage that was female dominant was completely unorthodox in the eyes of English elites. Gender roles, societal norms, ethnic conflict and fear of arbitrary rule characterized Mary’s reign and plagued her reputation. Samson definitely touches on these aspects but his argument is weakened by organization issues and repetition of arguments and materials discussed in previous chapters of his book.

]]>
By: RadGradReviewer https://2022hist635.jessicaotis.com/2022/02/13/book-review-mary-and-philip-the-marriage-of-tudor-england-and-hapsburg-spain/#comment-28 Thu, 17 Feb 2022 04:02:14 +0000 https://2022hist635.jessicaotis.com/?p=527#comment-28 I agree with Anna that the author crafted a historical narrative with appropriate use of intersectionality, particularly how gender informed political and economic leadership. I appreciate that she pointed to specific instances of when Samson would pull an example of symbolic actions as a means to assert Mary’s authority.

I also found myself lost at times in identifying Samson’s key points. I wonder if his approach reflects the fact that he is primarily associated with and thus acclimated to teaching and writing for Spanish, Portuguese and Latin American Studies rather than history. Still, I found it compelling that his professional position equipped him to survey the broad source basis that he pulled together. As he pointed out, the sources were geographically spread out and likely in various languages, which makes it more difficult for one scholar to evaluate (224). His familiarity with the historic Spanish culture and language ensured that he was able to mine meaning from these underrepresented narratives in a way previously unknown (14).

On a separate note, in your summary of the book, it struck me to what extent Samson discussed whether the English were xenophobic, which reminded me of the same query put forth in Immigrant England. As seen on page 140 of Mary and Philip and page 257 of Immigrant England, it appears the authors in both books reached a similar consensus in that many episodes of resentment towards “foreigners” surrounded specific issues, likely economic. As a result, this scholarly agreement further supports Samson’s implication that the English people’s reservations about Mary and Philip’s marriage was more complicated than people today sometimes believe.

]]>
By: Edward Kirsch https://2022hist635.jessicaotis.com/2022/02/13/book-review-mary-and-philip-the-marriage-of-tudor-england-and-hapsburg-spain/#comment-24 Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:21:38 +0000 https://2022hist635.jessicaotis.com/?p=527#comment-24 I agree with Anna, in her well written review, that Samson’s Introduction “took the reader through” a solid summary of the historiography surrounding Mary I and her marriage to Phillip and sets the stage for his arguments. As Anna observes, Samson states his goals for the book in this Introduction including providing a “balanced” narrative that addresses specific tropes, such of that of the dour, hysterical, fanatic Catholic Queen that dominated the traditional historiography, and (as Vincent notes in detail) popular culture as well. I would have found the book bewildering without this context. I share Vincent’s observation that at times Sansom has “so much information and evidence” that the detail can be overwhelming. However, I do not believe he “lost sight of the [proverbial] forest” with his detailed focus on so many trees. For the most part, I thought he ably supported his innovative arguments using overlooked Spanish sources. His background in the study of drama shines through in his use of iconography, dress, and literature to buttress his arguments.

]]>